Hi Aaron, On Monday 04 April 2005 13.46, Aaron Bentley wrote:
> I've written a script to re-link revision libraries. Normally, > this would corrupt them, but this script will re-write the inode > signatures. ~ Naturally, it verifies that each tree is not > corrupt, before attempting to re-link it. Awesome, it is something that I always wanted to have but never found the motivation to actually implement it. Thanks! > You can get it here: > [EMAIL PROTECTED]/library-relink--devel--0--patch-20 > http://push.sourcecontrol.net/archives/[EMAIL PROTECTED] >-baz/ I tried to get it today without specifying the revision but the get stopped at patch-23. It seems that patch-24 is corrupt, the diff file library-relink.py.diff looks suspicious. Can you confirm this? If so, do you have any idea what caused this (manual intervention in the archive, baz, the library relink script itself :-^, ...)? Robin _______________________________________________ Gnu-arch-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-arch-users GNU arch home page: http://savannah.gnu.org/projects/gnu-arch/
