Rob Weir wrote:
On Mon, Apr 25, 2005 at 09:38:36AM +0200, Ingo Buescher said
So the question is: is it possible at all with tla to have merges in form of a net, where everybody can merge from everybody and tla is smart enough to figure out, which patches are already applied (because of information in the wiki I thought this was possible) or does tla needs a tree like structure with one central developer, where everybody merges from and to?
And if it is possible to use tla in form of a net, any idea, what might have gone wrong?
As someone else explained, star-merge can't handle this situation; 'baz merge' can handle more complicated mesh arrangments, though, perhaps it's worth a try?
-rob
I'd like to give baz a try, but since we are using windows as our main developer plattform I have to wait until a win32 version is available - so far I was using the native win32 port of tla (version 1.3) and have switched to the cygwin version of tla-1.3.1 today.
Ingo Buescher
Well, once I can get gpgme to compile for cygwin, I'll probably get a version of baz for cygwin. I'm not sure why it is being such a pain, but I'm working on it.
So it should be soon, as in only a few weeks.
John =:->
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Gnu-arch-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-arch-users
GNU arch home page: http://savannah.gnu.org/projects/gnu-arch/
