On Wed, 2005-05-04 at 08:46 -0500, John A Meinel wrote: > David Allouche wrote: > > On Wed, 2005-04-27 at 01:01 +0100, Rene Schallner wrote: > > > >>BTW: I am not the author of octopy. See > >>http://www.ysaito.com/octopy/index.html for the original, documentation, > >>etc. > > > > > > Nothing has happened to octopy for a very long time (more than one > > year), I think the original author has lost interest. If you feel up to > > it, you could probably adopt it. > > > > I was thinking the same thing. I also thought that it would be nice if > he could make it work with pyarch, and/or pybaz, since those seem to be > the most actively maintained python bindings.
I would like that to happen (actually, octopy was one the projects that prompted the creation of pyarch in the first place), but I would not encourage it. PyArch has gone obsolete, as my focus in now on Bazaar, and PyBaz itself has little future. http://udu.wiki.ubuntu.com/PybazAndBzr If someone proposes improvements in pybaz, I will try to be more lenient in the next monthes since long term maintainability goals are now essentially void. -- -- ddaa
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Gnu-arch-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-arch-users GNU arch home page: http://savannah.gnu.org/projects/gnu-arch/
