On Wed, 2005-07-06 at 09:28 +1000, Brian May wrote: ... > >> The default =tagging-method isn't changing. Lusers can use > >> their own damn editor. > > I got the same response too. Which kind of confused me, because my > request had nothing to do with editors. Maybe I was right, he *did* > close the wrong bug report by mistake.
=tagging-method is configured by an editor :/. > Anyway, the bug I filled was bug #146480, > <URL:http://bugs.debian.org/146480>. I asked for clarification, and he > gave me clarification. Unfortunately, he did so via private mail, so I > can't repost his answer. However, it was along the lines of "upstream > won't make the change and I don't want to go against upstream". This > seem fair enough. Tom has been pretty open about accepting specific patches for the defaults new archives can use. I certainly don't recall this one being put up and then rejected. Maybe my memory is faulty? Cheers, Rob
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Gnu-arch-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-arch-users GNU arch home page: http://savannah.gnu.org/projects/gnu-arch/
