btw -- is sending html-formatted email hopelessly antisocial, especially on gnu-arch-dev? I typically hate it myself but that's mostly because it's usually spam.....
The first source release and some very early documentation for Arch 2.0 ("revc") is now ready!
Web page: <http://www.seyza.com/>
Source: <http://www.seyza.com/releases/revc-0.0x0.tar.gz>
Source (tar bundle) SHA1: 9c279f78e57a99d517ccf5b983960620ff6f2cf7
Source (tar bundle) size: 1732018
Some highlights: revc has only 10 core commands; there are about 165 functions; the source code is literally about 14K lines and is closer to 10K lines if you subtract out non-code boilerplate.
User complaints about tla 1.x being addressed in revc:
inventory is too complicated -- but is drastically simplified (almost eliminated) in 2.0
we hate the funny filenames -- 2.0 requires only a single .revc directory and you aren't expected to edit any files there. No more {arch}, {arch}/=tagging-method, or deeply nested project-tree logs
the namespace blows -- 2.0 allows just about any revision name that doesn't contain a slash character. There is a moderate limit on the length of a revision name.
all this stuff about registering archives and making mirrors is hard to learn -- and, in 2.0, it's all gone. You can use rsync to mirror stuff, for starters. And all archives are anonymous -- there's no longer any such thing as an archive name.
too much is too slow -- although the 2.0 code isn't especially optimized yet, it seems to be hella snappy.
2.0 is very much git influenced but it brings some (imo significant) improvements to the table.
-t
_______________________________________________ Gnu-arch-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-arch-users
GNU arch home page: http://savannah.gnu.org/projects/gnu-arch/
