Now, an interesting question is, why git at this stage? While git is being used, it is younger than any of these. How come there seem to be an impression that git is usable today, more so than arch, baz, bzr, etc.?
--- martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > However, people tell me bzr isn't ready for prime > time yet. Thus, > I am actively preventing myself from just switching > to git, waiting > in pain for bzr to become usable. > > What's the roadmap? > > -- > martin; > _______________________________________________ Gnu-arch-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-arch-users GNU arch home page: http://savannah.gnu.org/projects/gnu-arch/
