Quoting Ollivier Robert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > According to martin f krafft: > > However, people tell me bzr isn't ready for prime time yet. Thus, > > I am actively preventing myself from just switching to git, waiting > > in pain for bzr to become usable. > > bzr is very interesting but in the meantime, Mercurial is progressing very > well too. My personal opinion is that git is too primitive and I'd even > say that Mercurial is what git should be :)
Mercurial does not provide any facility for manipulating directories. Nor does git AFAIK. This is a major drawback. -- Jérôme Marant _______________________________________________ Gnu-arch-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-arch-users GNU arch home page: http://savannah.gnu.org/projects/gnu-arch/
