On Mon, 22 Aug 2005 19:23:42 -0700, Philippe Moutarlier wrote: > Ok, sorry if this was brought up before. I tried to search the archive > but could not find answers to this.... > > I am new to tla/arch and trying to prove to people to my company that it > could be a cool idea instead of CVS. I just installed it and tried some > simple edit/commit on a quite large tree (i.e. same size as a full linux > kernel). > > I am using explicit tagging method on a local hard drive, even if a > laptop one. Now my problem (and a show stopper for my company guys), is > the time it takes to compute the changes and/or commit them. It takes up > to 3 minutes before it even gets to the "update pristine tree" phase, > then you must add 1:30 minute to get the final "committed". > > This seems to be extremely slow compared to my experience of CVS on a > remote NFS mounted repository. Am I doing something wrong or is there a > way to improve this ?
A revision library will improve the performance dramatically. Anand _______________________________________________ Gnu-arch-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-arch-users GNU arch home page: http://savannah.gnu.org/projects/gnu-arch/
