John A Meinel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I still feel like StGIT is barking up the wrong tree. You have a tool > which handles repeated modifications and merging, and then you put > another one on top of it that does exactly the same thing, only throwing > out history. So why not just give a "throw out history" option, and then > not have to worry about multiple pieces repeating themselves.
I think my other three posts didn't get to the list because it seems to be subscriber-only. I explained there a bit of the StGIT ideas. I will re-post with a different address. -- Catalin _______________________________________________ Gnu-arch-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-arch-users GNU arch home page: http://savannah.gnu.org/projects/gnu-arch/
