On Thu, Sep 08, 2005 at 09:42:28AM +0800, Lalo Martins wrote: > And so says James Blackwell on 08/09/05 09:12... > > Anyways, lets talk about something more technical. I think that the > > refactoring approach, while good for proprietary software, is bad for free > > software because it raises the bar for scratch-your-own itch. > > I'd disagree. Well-factored code is easier to maintain, and easier for > newcomers to contribute to.
Ahh. I mispoke. I think already refactored code is good. I think writing code with the intent of refactoring it later isn't so good. I think code should be clean before its put into the codebase so that its as readable as possible. That way others looking to fix something will be able to clearly understand the code. > > best, > Lalo Martins > -- > So many of our dreams at first seem impossible, > then they seem improbable, and then, when we > summon the will, they soon become inevitable. > -- > http://www.exoweb.net/ mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > GNU: never give up freedom http://www.gnu.org/ > > > > _______________________________________________ > Gnu-arch-users mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-arch-users > > GNU arch home page: > http://savannah.gnu.org/projects/gnu-arch/ -- James Blackwell | Life is made of the stuff that hasn't killed Tell someone a joke! | you yet. - yours truly ---------------------------------------------------------------------- GnuPG (ID 06357400) AAE4 8C76 58DA 5902 761D 247A 8A55 DA73 0635 7400 _______________________________________________ Gnu-arch-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-arch-users GNU arch home page: http://savannah.gnu.org/projects/gnu-arch/
