Mikhael Goikhman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > You may still use tla, that just works. If you are risky, you may use baz > as well, that works well for simple usages. For more non-trivial usages, > in my experience, it may periodically show slowness, panic exits and lots > of small annoyances (input verification, stdout vus stderr for chat).
This is your personal experience, but Canonical is managing a very large number of archives, and actually developed Bazaar because tla didn't feet their needs. About reliability, Bazaar development introduced some new bugs, but also fixed a lot of bugs that Tom never fixed in tla. Try to do a "tla get [EMAIL PROTECTED]/..." for example. Therefore, in practice, whether you find tla or baz more reliable really depends on your user profile. -- Matthieu _______________________________________________ Gnu-arch-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-arch-users GNU arch home page: http://savannah.gnu.org/projects/gnu-arch/
