Depending on the goals. If we take the minimal goals, of keeping the current GNU Arch 1.x going, without aiming at solving some of the bigger problems like the Windows port and performance for Linux kernel-size projects, tla 1.x should be able to continue with much less work. Of course it is not ideal to many people, but the current implementation is usable for many projects.
Tom, do you see that as something requiring much less efforts? And in the mean time, we hope someone will pick up the 2.0 codebase and continue with it. Maybe Tom will go back to it. --- Thomas Lord <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Maintaining a project takes up a lot of time/money. > > -t > _______________________________________________ Gnu-arch-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-arch-users GNU arch home page: http://savannah.gnu.org/projects/gnu-arch/
