Miles Bader <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Sure, tla/arch is full of these stupid little implementation problems, > though they're not bad enough in practice to put much urgency in my > search for a replacement[*].
Clearly. I'm not saying GNU Arch is a bad RCS. Just that it's possible to do better (and that a lot of people are actually working on doing better). > I've love a modern RCS that takes the good points of arch and fixes > the problems, a net improvement. But that's not what I find when I > look around; I find a bunch of RCSs that improve on some of tla's > annoying points -- and add stupid boners of their own (like git's > creaky rename resolution strategy). Did you have a look at bzr? I'm not yet 100% satisfied with it, and I didn't use it enough to really judge, but it seems really promising. (well who's better than who is a rather subjective question. I see a real improvement in Bazaar compared to tla while you didn't for example) -- Matthieu _______________________________________________ Gnu-arch-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-arch-users GNU arch home page: http://savannah.gnu.org/projects/gnu-arch/
