Alfred> I agree, but then you'd kinda need to ditch the whole GNU
Alfred> project into a trashcan, and start over (maybe reusing
Alfred> existing code). Simply not a option, so it is better to
Alfred> do this in a evolutionary manner.
Isn't it contradictory to talk about starting over and reusing
existing code in the same breath?
You skip words, this time it is `maybe'. And you really don't want to
rewrite emacs; hence why you want to reuse some code.
Anyway, this can be perfectly "evolutionary" and consistent with
GNU's state. We're talking about filling in gaps in the
bootstrapping tower, cleaning up the configure/build infrastructure
for core apps, and promoting a second configure/build
infrastructure for other apps.
Alas, package-framework is not evolutionary at all.
_______________________________________________
Gnu-arch-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-arch-users
GNU arch home page:
http://savannah.gnu.org/projects/gnu-arch/
