Andrew Suffield wrote: > > Before this is viable, it *must* be possible to turn this behaviour > off. On large trees, cacherevs are massively wasteful of space; > revision libraries are often a more efficient solution. On the other hand, if you have a large tree, and you do not have any revlib revision in the last 50 or so revisions, your performance sucks anyway. > > -- > .''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Andrew Suffield > : :' : http://www.debian.org/ | > `. `' | > `- -><- | > Derek
_______________________________________________ Gnu-arch-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-arch-users GNU arch home page: http://savannah.gnu.org/projects/gnu-arch/
