On Fri, Nov 25, 2005 at 06:57:06PM +0000, Andrew Suffield wrote: > > Besides, a revlib consumes a _huge_ amount of inodes that constitutes a > > real problem in many cases (compared to one tarball per 50 revisions). > > git already proved this is not a real problem.
It's has been something that has troubled the kernel.org people. Perhaps a different implementation of revlibs might help. Matt _______________________________________________ Gnu-arch-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-arch-users GNU arch home page: http://savannah.gnu.org/projects/gnu-arch/
