Hi, as expresed in the opinions of many people here, automatic removal of rev libraries by tla is not something that will happen. At the very most we put them in a directory to allow the user to be full responsible for his own actions...
Nontheless, thanks for Derek for sending patches. Keep them coming! Andy --- Robert Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Trying again with an address the listserv likes > > On Wed, 2005-11-30 at 17:00 -0800, Derek Zhou wrote: > > Addressing Matthieu's concern. Now it prints a warning message. Also does > > a rename before the rm. > > I know I haven't posted much here recently. But let me add to this > thread - I completely agree with Tom on this... > > I think that removing corrupt revlib entries is a profoundly bad idea, > there are way to many things that can go wrong when removing it (and > renaming before rm_rf only mitigates, it does not remove those things), > let alone the lack of ability to diagnose something that should be > extremely rare (IME folk rarely move revlibs around - I only recall two > users that have done that; compare with folk moving pristines around, > copying trees, scping them etc - those I was hearing complaints on > near-daily at one point). > > Rob > -- > GPG key available at: <http://www.robertcollins.net/keys.txt>. > > _______________________________________________ > Gnu-arch-users mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-arch-users > > GNU arch home page: > http://savannah.gnu.org/projects/gnu-arch/ _______________________________________________ Gnu-arch-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-arch-users GNU arch home page: http://savannah.gnu.org/projects/gnu-arch/
