Thanks for these patches! I will incorporate them. My personal opinion is to still keep the -B, -b and -w as direct opinions to tla diff since these seem to be more common cases of custom options people want from diff... but arbitrary diff options will be definitely in.
Let me know of any strong opinions on this matter :-) Andy --- Ludovic Court�s <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > Haakon Riiser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Great, but could you also support the -B/--ignore-blank-lines > > option? (I tend to use -Bb when reviewing diffs, since that > > combination excludes changes that normally are just cosmetics.) > > Here's an untested patch: > > I slightly modified this patch in my branch[*] so that one can use both > options at the same time (you need `patch-2' and `patch-3' for this). > > However, I thought that a generic option that would allow to pass > arbitrary options to `diff' would be more flexible (`patch-4' implements > this and removes `-b' and `-w'). Basically, this new option, namely > `--diff-options' or `-D', can be used as follows: > _______________________________________________ Gnu-arch-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-arch-users GNU arch home page: http://savannah.gnu.org/projects/gnu-arch/
