Andy Tai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > The functionality mentioned here would be especially useful on Microsoft > Windows, where the current tla does not work well due to path name length > issues. > I am probably trolling, however, does anyone actually use tla on windows (mingw or cygwin) on a day to day basis? I mean tla can almost be regarded as windows hostile by design: * very long path name with wierd chars; * windows has no hard link, ie. no revlib * lots of small files that may trash FAT filesystem performance (not sure about NTFS though) IMHO, we probably better off just ignore windows users altogether and focus on real POSIX systems. After all, we probably should cater to our main userbase first. Derek
_______________________________________________ Gnu-arch-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-arch-users GNU arch home page: http://savannah.gnu.org/projects/gnu-arch/
