Le Lundi 09 Janvier 2006 21:46, Milan Cvetkovic a écrit : > Let's just say that the probability of corrupting a database while > working with it is much higher than probability of corrupting files > while reading them. > > My trust in tla *and* sqlite and together is much smaller than my trust > in tla only (or sqlite only), not because sqlite is not good, but > because my trust (lower than 100% multiplies) with each. > > In fact, I would like to see tla make revision directories/files > read/only right after creation. Maybe one day I add such thing to tla... > > Milan. >
With my job, I design and use every day databases, if corruption was a problem with databases, why databases are used for storing critical data in our day? What is important is to be aware of how an rcs works, and what are the constraint, because this implies well adapted design for database, and a good convention for the access and the queries. -- Cordialement, Aldrik Citation de fortune : <spyderous> thanks luca. remind me never to go to a hooter's web site again, it freezes my sex-deprived computer.
pgppOXT6etFbI.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Gnu-arch-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-arch-users GNU arch home page: http://savannah.gnu.org/projects/gnu-arch/
