> Some people are comfortable with the byzantine command set and > semantics, to the point that the insanity of TLA's user > interface becomes a cognitive blind spot. > > I don't think that tla's user interface is that insane.
I did not think that tla user interface was that bad either, until I did support for a bunch of brilliant and extremely competent users, and they rubbed my nose in it until I realized how it actually smells. You are complaining without actually saying what you are complaining about. The UI for baz is _exactly_ the same as for tla, yet you claim that baz has `significatly improved it'; which is bogus since the interface is the same with some minor improvments that were a bit weird--which is quite OK since nobody gets everything perfect from the start. Maybe instead of starting to flame, you could come up with specific critisicim as to how the UI is bad. Reapting that it `smells bad' won't get you anywhere. _______________________________________________ Gnu-arch-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-arch-users GNU arch home page: http://savannah.gnu.org/projects/gnu-arch/
