Hi, "Stephen J. Turnbull" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> So > I think the recommended license for documentation should be a software > license, not a hardcopy license. IANAL, but isn't the documentation (the tutorial) more likely to be distributed in printed form than to be included within the source code? Thanks, Ludovic. _______________________________________________ Gnu-arch-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-arch-users GNU arch home page: http://savannah.gnu.org/projects/gnu-arch/
