Andy, I would probably be remiss if I didn't mention that the Wiki is specifically licensed GPLv2. The archives will have more details concerning as to who* and why&. I believe its effectively impossible for the wiki license to change to v2 or later, though I would be happy if such a possibility existed.
Regards, James * I'm the perp. & At the time that I set up the wiki I did not consider the GFDL as a free license (still don't, actually). I was concerned that later versions of the GPL could potentially have similiar issues (I no longer hold this view). On Tue, Jan 17, 2006 at 12:28:31PM -0800, Andy Tai wrote: > Hi, the first draft of the GNU GPL v3 has been released and I like what I > see. In light of this I just want to explicitly ensure that new > contributors to tla know that you allow the licensing of your code to be > under the GNU GPL v2 or any later version of the GNU GPL as published by the > Free Software Foundation. (Tom's code has been assigned to the FSF so the > majority of the code in tla shall be of no problem. ) > > So, as a note, if you send source code patches in for tla, you give the > permission for this licensing condition :-) > > Regards, > Andy > _______________________________________________ > Gnu-arch-users mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-arch-users > > GNU arch home page: > http://savannah.gnu.org/projects/gnu-arch/ -- James Blackwell's home : http://jblack.linuxguru.net Gnupg 06357400 F-print AAE4 8C76 58DA 5902 761D 247A 8A55 DA73 0635 7400
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Gnu-arch-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-arch-users GNU arch home page: http://savannah.gnu.org/projects/gnu-arch/
