In that case someone with good knowledge of tla should take a good look
at some of the scripts in tla-tools. tla-prune-revlib, at least in the
debian version 2005.0.patch.26-1 that I have, uses a straight-out rm -rf
on the revlib folders, something I would guess is a little dangerous if
a copy of tla is presently using that revlib for a changes operation. It
would be safer to first mv the revlib folder to a dummy name (like
,,deleteme) before performing the rm -rf, no?
Andy Tai wrote:
Yes, that would be a great idea in increasing tla's usability. I will
look into this; a contrib directory would be a place to include tla-tools.
On 1/23/06, * Alfred M. Szmidt* <[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>>
wrote:
How about distributing tla-prune-revlib with tla? And maybe the rest
of tla-tools?
--
Tim Gokcen
Mpathix - Development
begin:vcard
fn:Tim Gokcen
n:Gokcen;Tim
org:Mpathix Inc.;Development
adr:Suite 201;;5090 Explorer Drive;Mississauga;Ontario;L4W 4T9;Canada
email;internet:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
tel;work:(905) 238-7638 ext. 224
tel;home:(416) 425-1532
x-mozilla-html:TRUE
url:http://www.mpathix.com
version:2.1
end:vcard
_______________________________________________
Gnu-arch-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-arch-users
GNU arch home page:
http://savannah.gnu.org/projects/gnu-arch/
