Hi, Andrea Russo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I've done a tla get on that branch, but it seems something wrong > happened. I ended up with a tree without the texi directory: Gosh, my `base-0' revision was deeply broken. That should be fixed now. What happened is that `base-0' did not contain the files that correspond to `CONTINUATION'. Instead it contained those of another branched I had tagged earlier as `arch-tutorial--devo--1.3'. I had then done some nasty things, including removing the newly created `arch-tutorial' branch by hand (i.e., `rm -rf') before recreating it with a *different* continuation. In the meantime, `arch-tutorial--devo--1.3--base-0' (the wrong one) had entered the revlib, so the first import of the new `arch-tutorial--devo--1.3' yielded that wrong `...base-0.tar.gz'. Is `import' relying on the revlib? If so, I guess it shouldn't, because a `base-0' revision should not be in the revlib before the first import. Anyway the conclusion is: don't do nasty things with your archives -- or be very careful. ;-) Thanks, Ludovic. _______________________________________________ Gnu-arch-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-arch-users GNU arch home page: http://savannah.gnu.org/projects/gnu-arch/
