On Thu, 2006-03-16 16:40:05 -0800, Thomas Lord <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Matthew: > >> If I discover that you have made a binary derived from the sources I > > I don't get it; Centos is still going ok. > > Centos can take my GNU Hello sources, compile them, and distribute > those binaries (assuming they make source available and take pains > to exclude my additional file with restrictive copyright).
Do you want to distribute a GPLd program along with a (more or less _needed) additional file, which is under restrictive copyright? In this case, you'll probably have to play some games to make _your_ distribution of sources comply with GPL... MfG, JBG -- Jan-Benedict Glaw [EMAIL PROTECTED] . +49-172-7608481 _ O _ "Eine Freie Meinung in einem Freien Kopf | Gegen Zensur | Gegen Krieg _ _ O für einen Freien Staat voll Freier Bürger" | im Internet! | im Irak! O O O ret = do_actions((curr | FREE_SPEECH) & ~(NEW_COPYRIGHT_LAW | DRM | TCPA));
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Gnu-arch-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-arch-users GNU arch home page: http://savannah.gnu.org/projects/gnu-arch/
