Thomas Lord <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Matthieu Moy wrote: >> There's another subtle detail that I don't remember exactly about a >> file which was supposed to be here in tla's archive and which was >> not actually there. > You are probably thinking about the possibility of creating empty > categories and > branches. The original format supports that.
No. The changes are listed here (at the bottom): http://bazaar-vcs.org/ReleaseNotes1%2e0 The point I had in mind was the ".archive-version is listed in /.listing", which is indeed mostly a minor bugfix over tla. -- Matthieu _______________________________________________ Gnu-arch-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-arch-users GNU arch home page: http://savannah.gnu.org/projects/gnu-arch/
