> {
> int foo;
> foo = 0;
> int bar;
> }These are not silly. This was not a valid "C" last time I checked. It is valid GNU C though, and I think it might be valid C99. But I don't have the standard at hand. _______________________________________________ Gnu-arch-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-arch-users GNU arch home page: http://savannah.gnu.org/projects/gnu-arch/
