Sean Champ wrote:
I trust the design of Arch, as it being rock-solid.
Well, thank you. It has a few sharp corners but, if it is not too immodest, I basically agree.
I consider that it should be some comfortable work, to interface an Arch archive from within a Common Lisp system.
I think (or at least hope) that you'll find a CL implementation to be compact and clean. A suggestion: you may find it easiest to build and test-as-you-go if you retrace the steps of the original development. In other words, build and debug the layers in the same order they were originally built. That would mean building `inventory' support first, then `mkpatch/dopatch', then archives, then revision libraries. -t _______________________________________________ Gnu-arch-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-arch-users GNU arch home page: http://savannah.gnu.org/projects/gnu-arch/
