Hi, Thomas Lord <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The main problem reported in the Savannah bug report appears > to be a user error. In this case, tla did the right thing by signalling > an error. With Ludovic's patch, tla would do the wrong thing > by making an archive at (what is probably) the wrong location. I think I understand your point. OTOH, I'd rather say "what is _possibly_ the wrong location", assuming the user is aware of what they're doing. As mentioned by Sylvain in the Savannah bug report, one possibility would be to simply create an archive _within_ the directory at hand, instead of _at_ this directory, but this would look inconsistent with former practice at Savannah. So, yes, this can be seen as a pure Savannah problem, not a `tla' one. OTOH, ... Oh, well, we could argue at length about this but it's not so important after all. Maybe a `--really' option would yield consensus? ;-) Thanks, Ludovic. _______________________________________________ Gnu-arch-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-arch-users GNU arch home page: http://savannah.gnu.org/projects/gnu-arch/
