>>>>> "Miles" == Miles Bader <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Miles> Miles> Eh, how does that follow? Docbook sources are horribly ugly -- they're Miles> _so_ verbose that it's often quite a chore to even find the underlying Miles> text for all the layers of (verbose) tagging. I've never written a Miles> document in docbook, but for the same reason it looks like pure drudgery Miles> to write if you're not using rather heavy editor magic.
I have. I've never written a texinfo document (at all) but I cannot imagine that to be an improvement over docbook. Miles> Miles> I would never consider docbook an acceptable source form as long as Miles> people expect to able to reasonably edit the sources as raw text. A vanishingly small number of potential markup languages fit that bill. Unless your markup requirements are presentation-only and not very complex. I don't expect people to write program code without some form of editor assist, for that matter. -- Mark A. Flacy Any opinions expressed above are my own. Any facts expressed above that you could detect means my weasel wording needs work. _______________________________________________ Gnu-arch-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-arch-users GNU arch home page: http://savannah.gnu.org/projects/gnu-arch/
