[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ludovic Court.ANhs) writes: > what they think goes wrong (it is true that `tla' is not lightning fast, > especially without a revlib).
More accurately, tla is dog-slow and consumes cpu/disk-io like crazy for most operations (it's slightly better about network-io in terms of bytes transferred, but goes to town with the worst latency ever). I still use tla, mind you, but my number one complaint is its insane inefficiency; maybe darcs is slower, I dunno. -Miles -- $B<+$i$r6u$K$7$F!"?4$r3+$/;~!"F;$O3+$+$l$k(B _______________________________________________ Gnu-arch-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-arch-users GNU arch home page: http://savannah.gnu.org/projects/gnu-arch/
