> By the way, I also have a friend who disabled Arch at his website
> (patapouf.org - vcs.patapouf.org) because ArchZoom would apparently
> consume too much /tmp space for its own good. Does that ring a bell?

Ok, apparently is was old v0.4.5-1 (Debian Sarge).

Probably that was fixed since then :)

-- 
Sylvain


_______________________________________________
Gnu-arch-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-arch-users

GNU arch home page:
http://savannah.gnu.org/projects/gnu-arch/

Reply via email to