"Richard M. Stallman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > In my case I have GD installed on my machine because I think it helps > me, and I wanted to interface to it, to make my Emacs experience > better. If there were a free replacement I would use that instead and > interface to that one. > > We can't treat a non-free program as ethically legitimate > merely because there is no free program that replaces it! > > True, but its not just about ethics, but more necessity. I use some commercial software on my GNU/Linux system simply because there is no free version available which meets my requirements and these are fundamental to being able to work on Linux. I have released som software as GPL which interfaces with the commercial software. If there was free/open source version that had the features I require, I'd use it, but there isn't.
Tim -- Tim Cross The e-mail address on this message is FALSE (obviously!). My real e-mail is to a company in Australia called rapttech and my login is tcross - if you really need to send mail, you should be able to work it out! _______________________________________________ Gnu-emacs-sources mailing list Gnu-emacs-sources@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-emacs-sources