"Richard M. Stallman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

>     In my case I have GD installed on my machine because I think it helps
>     me, and I wanted to interface to it, to make my Emacs experience
>     better. If there were a free replacement I would use that instead and
>     interface to that one.
> 
> We can't treat a non-free program as ethically legitimate
> merely because there is no free program that replaces it!
> 
> 
True, but its not just about ethics, but more necessity. I use some
commercial software on my GNU/Linux system simply because there is no
free version available which meets my requirements and these are
fundamental to being able to work on Linux. I have released som
software as GPL which interfaces with the commercial software. If
there was free/open source version that had the features I require, 
I'd use it, but there isn't. 

Tim

-- 
Tim Cross
The e-mail address on this message is FALSE (obviously!). My real e-mail is
to a company in Australia called rapttech and my login is tcross - if you 
really need to send mail, you should be able to work it out!
_______________________________________________
Gnu-emacs-sources mailing list
Gnu-emacs-sources@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-emacs-sources

Reply via email to