[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Edward M. Reingold) writes: >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Edward M. Reingold) writes: >>> How do you know that the holidays are correct when the calendar >>> has more than 3 months? Do you have a way to check, say, the dates >>> of lunar phases, Easter, Chinese New Year, Yom Kippur, Islamic New >>> Year, solstices/equinoxes? You will see SOME holidays (or diary >>> entries) but not all that apply to the months displayed.
I now see that I misread this question: I read it as it was about the hack as it is implemented now and how I know that the hack works with non-fixed holidays, not about my comment about the non-implemented dynamically sized calendar. The answer to the question above is: I don't know, and that is why I wrote that I had to specifically test for it if it were implemented, for instance in the way that RMS wrote in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>. [...] > if the window is 5 months wide, they could be visible and the > command to list or highlight all holidays will miss them. > > Almost all of the non-trivial holidays/diary entries would suffer in > the same way, so rewriting the code properly to display a wider > window means modifying almost every holiday/diary function in some > (usually non-obvious) way. That supports the point I was trying to make. Since this feature is not implemented I do not have to bother with it in the modified code - as the current calendar is static. Affi _______________________________________________ gnu-emacs-sources mailing list gnu-emacs-sources@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-emacs-sources