"[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> > You mean commands? >> >> Yes :) > > It's possible already, you just need to write the source for it:
Cool! > Do you still think the results should be indented? I added empty > separator lines between results form different sources and I think > it improved readability. That made it better indeed, and without seeing it I cannot say whether indenting the matches will make it even better, or not. > The only problem is I couldn't think of any practical example where > it would be useful to choose from several actions to execute. For > example, what else would one want to do with buffers besides > switching to them? Killing them? One usually kills the current > buffer, so it doesn't seem very useful. The same with files. What > else would one want to do with them than opening them? Maybe buffers isn't the best example, a better one could be friends, or colleagues. Say I want to send a chat message to my friend. Using `anything' I type in his name and get a match, then I get to choose whether I want to start to chat with him or send him an e-mail. Of course, I could always define two sources, one for chat and one for e-mail... Anyway, maybe that can give you an idea. BTW, I am trying out `anything' as a replacement for iswitchb right now :) /Mathias _______________________________________________ gnu-emacs-sources mailing list gnu-emacs-sources@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-emacs-sources
