> On Tue, 14 Sep 2010 11:11:33 +0200 > Henry Jensen <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Hello,
Hello, >> >> On Mon, 13 Sep 2010 21:20:44 +0200 >> Sam Geeraerts <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> > Karl Goetz wrote: >> > > hi all, >> > > nonfsdg lists the adobe cmap files files non-free. according to >> > > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=548195 , they >> > > have been freed. should we update the page to mention that? >> > >> > I vote yes. Is this also true for older versions of the CMap files? >> > Not very clear to me from reading the bug report. >> >> Objection. Not all CMap file are free as of the latest version 8.71, >> see below. Accordingly this files are not part of GNU Ghostscript >> (GNU Ghostscript 8.71.1 was released a few days ago). > > Does Ghostscript include cmap files as they are freed by adobe? > I don't think so -- or at least, the latest version of GNU Ghostscript (8.71.1) does not contain an updated copyright notice. >> Some files may be freed, but not all. So I see no reason remove the >> issue from the list. > > It doesn't need to be removed, just updated to point out that its been > freed (or a greater portion is freed), and that you may like to include > the package after cleaning it. > Yes, it is a solution. >> /usr/share/ghostscript/8.71/Resource/CMap$ grep "that the contents of >> this file are not altered" * |cut -d: -f1 90ms-RKSJ-UCS2 >> 90pv-RKSJ-UCS2 >> 90pv-RKSJ-UCS2C > (trim list) > kk > Regards, Matias
