On Sat, 6 Nov 2010 11:10:10 -0300 Diego Saravia <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>> are they using linux-libre kernel and moving normal kernels into > >>> non-free? > >> why? pointless? > >> > >> I want to know, > >> > >> what is the problem with my question? > > > > It adds no value, and its rhetorical. > > It adds value for me, I ask a question, now I know the answer I'm genuinely interested to know - what value does it add to you? > rhetorical? ???? my 2 questions are completly focused, you can answer > each of them with a yer or no > > ll in debian: NO > k to nf in debian: NO Thats true, but doesn't prevent them being rhetorical. > >> why is debian kernel people attention over us, so important ? > > > > Not sure I understand what you mean here. > > you said: > > > > Can people stop saying stuff like this? its utterly utterly > > > pointless, and just makes debian kernel people pay /less/ > > > attention to us. kk > > I want to know what are your reasons that justify what you said. > > You speaked about WE > > Did you mean that WE have a plan, and that plan needs debian kernel > people attention? The 'us' or 'we' i referred to above was any libre distribution based on Debian (or anyone from this list who wants to talk with Debian). > What is our message to debian kernee people? Bug reports generally. > Why do we need their attention? Because if they are willing to free their kernel further it benefits /all/ users of Debian/its kernels. > Are we asking them to use linux-libre? I haven't, perhaps others have? > Are we asking them to take out blobs? Yes, we do at times. (And hopefully more in the future). kk -- Karl Goetz, (Kamping_Kaiser / VK5FOSS) Debian contributor / gNewSense Maintainer http://www.kgoetz.id.au No, I won't join your social networking group
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
