> While projects like linux-libre and icecat are not the legal copyright > holder of the source isn't relevant to us; the licence they are > distributed under gives us the permission we need. (No one entity holds > all the copyright to Linux either).
yes, nobody says that you dont have the right to distribute. the point is that what you distribute are not: "the sources" > Saying we don't have source code because we are not the originator of > the project is a logical fallacy. I am not speaking about "have", con can get the real sources, from original project. > Not sure what you were getting at there. the true.
