On Fri, 30 Mar 2012 13:04:43 +0200 Jaromil <jaro...@dyne.org> wrote: > > hi Brett > > On Mon, 19 Mar 2012, Brett Smith wrote: > > > Is anybody interested in taking a deeper look at Chromium's current > > status to see if there might be a way to include it now? I remain > > loyal to Mozilla-based browsers myself, but I know a lot of users > > are interested in Chromium, so it would be nice if that was an > > option free distros could provide. > > > I've checked through the list of licenses now comfortably offered by > the built-in url chrome://credits which is generated by a script in > the source which can be trusted, AFAIK. > > There are many components and I wouldn't rely on my single analysis > now, since some details might have slipped through my attention, > however my outcome is positive, most licenses are BSD, Apache, MIT, > public domain, Expat etc. plus of course GNU GPL v2 and v3. To me it > seems there are no proprietary licenses tainting chromium ATM. > > looking forward to more opinions.
For consistency sake, which version did you check? If someone who doesn't a 2nd look checks a different version you'll get different results strait off the bat. thanks, kk -- Karl Goetz, (Kamping_Kaiser / VK7FOSS) http://www.kgoetz.id.au No, I won't join your social networking group *** I've changed GPG key to 6C097260 ***
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature