On 07/08/14 06:23, Sam Geeraerts wrote: > Op Mon, 28 Jul 2014 12:47:24 +0200 > schreef m...@mtjm.eu (Michał Masłowski): > >> Hello. A user found a nonfree library source being bundled with >> Ghostscript. >> (snip) >> Debian removes that library, so it should be already fixed in derived >> distros. >> >> Should we update the #GPL_Ghostscript_CMap_data_files entry of the >> non-FSDG list to recommend removing that library (or updating to a >> future GNU Ghostscript version without it, or using Debian's cleaned >> source)? > > I say update it to recommend removal (at least until there is a version > without it).
Debian has a version with the files removed; their cleaned source could be repackaged.
