El 15/06/16 a las 04:26, coadde escribió: > On 06/15/2016 04:23 AM, André Silva wrote: >> On 06/15/2016 03:15 AM, André Silva wrote: >>> On 06/15/2016 02:57 AM, coadde wrote: >>>> Now, see my new proposal below with the new changes about invariant >>>> sections, what do you think? >>> >>> +1, however i think we could add another detail in the exception part in >>> clause 2 to mean "cover texts" as another exception, eg: >>> >>> 2. **Parabola is Free Culture**: All documentation and cultural works >>> included in products of the Parabola project are [Free >>> Culture](http://freedomdefined.org/Definition), >>> with the exceptions of: [licenses for works stating a >>> viewpoint](http://www.gnu.org/licenses/license-list.html#OpinionLicenses), >>> [invariant >>> sections](https://www.gnu.org/licenses/fdl-howto-opt#SEC1) and >>> [cover texts](https://www.gnu.org/licenses/fdl-howto-opt#SEC2). >>> All documentation and cultural works created by or for Parabola are >>> Free Culture, with no exceptions. >> >> I forgot add my suggestion about adhocracy with some changes for clause 4 :P >> >> ----------------------------------------------------------------------- >> >> 4. **Parabola and its community**: Parabola's community is [democratic >> in its essence](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Consensus_democracy) >> and [adhocratic](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adhocracy) as form of >> organization, >> so the community is to be included whenever there is a need to make >> a decision. >> We encourage community participation in the development of the >> project. >> >> ----------------------------------------------------------------------- >> >> Adding "adhocracy" as form of organization clarify how works the >> development of the project to encourage community participation. ;) >> >> What do you think guys? > > +1
+1
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature