On 01/17/2018 04:32 PM, Jason Self wrote: > That's already a thing: One of the criteria in the GNU FSDG is that "to > be listed, a distribution should be actively maintained." i would strongly suggest that guideline be changed to require the distro only to be available and functional and to remove it only if it were found to contain something malicious or non-free - as i pointed out in my previous post, "Live" distros such as dynebolic are intentionally designed to be forever static in form and never modified; but only replaced entirely with a new release (or not) - the FSDG does not require that a new release be perpetually forth-coming; and this FSDG guideline jason mentions, if strictly applied, would exclude dynebolic and musix from endorsement by their very nature of not being amenable to "maintenance"
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
