On Fri, Jan 19, 2018 at 11:57:00AM -0500, Robert Call wrote: > On Fri, 2018-01-19 at 10:57 -0500, bill-auger wrote: > > On 01/19/2018 03:19 AM, alimira...@riseup.net wrote: > > > hi > > > What about add uruk gnu/linux to gnu free list > > > I asck this Questions again > > > Let's finish this long long story > > > > > > > the FSDG says to request evaluation by sending an email to > > <licens...@fsf.org> with a description of the system and a link to > > the > > distro web page > > > > Responding in this way does not help since they had already done this. > There have been a few threads already about Uruk GNU/Linux. I'm still > quite infuriated that the Free Software Foundation is giving special > treatment for some over others. At lest Uruk uses the linux-libre > kernel and they did set up their own repository that they control. > While they still leverage Trisquel's repositories, I could understand > that it does take quite a bit in terms of infrastructure to fully > maintain a standalone repository. The FSF should be willing to help if > there is a problem with a lack of infrastructure. If I need to reach > out to Uruk and try to remedy this issue I will. > > If the FSF continues to pick favorites, I personally would have to > withdraw my support of the Free Software Foundation.
Don't rush with such statements, I do not see which facts did you observe that "FSF is picking favorites"? Did you contact personally somebody from FSF and asked what is wrong? Did they answer to you? Jean