* bill-auger <[email protected]> [2021-04-14 23:24]: > On Wed, 14 Apr 2021 19:10:18 +0300 Jean wrote: > > he can make his own distribution policies and make distribution > > better than then what FSDG requires it, just as Hyperbola > > GNU/Linux-libre is doing it. > > it is not my distro - there is no "I", who makes policy for
OK, I wanted to say it as person or group, rather than he, it does not matter what is written, that is what I wanted, I was speaking of all distributions. > (correct me if im wrong) parabola is the only FSDG distro which: > > * supports ARM (very important for self-hosting and hobbyists) > * supports RISC-V and POWER9 (libre hardware beyond thinkpads) > * offers the choice of init-systems > * offers privacy-enhanced builds of software, > in addition to the full-featured, FSDG-fit builds Sounds good, I just don't have access to ARM, is it like Android devices? I have recently installed Replicant on one. > if some people value the extra things that hyperbola does, > which no other distro does, then they can run hyperbola, and are > entitled to the opinion that hyperbola is "better" - no distro > can satisfy everyone - there is no objective: "_is_ better" - > there is only: "that one suits me better" It is always not objectively better. That is clear. People say their opinions. > regardless of how awesome i think parabola is, i never miss an > opportunity to suggest, that most people should _not_ run > parabola as their primary system, but that an LTS distro > probably suits them better Of course not, I need developing edition, as that is how I get some key software that helps in my life, like marble, gpxsee, QGIS, proj, Emacs, latest PostgreSQL, etc. What I personally need is Hyperbola style management and Parabola style upgraded distribution. -- Jean Take action in Free Software Foundation campaigns: https://www.fsf.org/campaigns Sign an open letter in support of Richard M. Stallman https://stallmansupport.org/ https://rms-support-letter.github.io/
