On Sat, 25 Mar 2023 09:12:01 +0300 Jean wrote: > I suggest that you make a message very conclusive in itself so that > readers may understand how Chromium is related to your withdrawal of > the offer to participate in the review.
my reason is personal - i have grown weary of discussing it - in this case, it appears that any conclusions regarding chromium in the context of uruk, could not be addressed by the uruk maintainers - only the pureos maintainers could do anything about it; and thie issue has already been thoroughly discussed with the pureos maintainers - in my lonely opinion, pureos and guix are out of compliance with the FSDG, both knowingly and willingly - therefore, i automatically have the same opinion of uruk, if it is effectively "pureos in disguise" for those interested, simply search this mailing list for "chromium" - i have stated many many times, on this list and others, my opinion and the crisis facing the FSDG, which hinges largely on a resolution of that topic here is a few starting points https://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/gnu-linux-libre/2019-10/msg00012.html https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/directory-discuss/2017-11/msg00003.html
