[[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider ]]] [[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies, ]]] [[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]]
> ruben suggested that the wording is confusing, and that GNU has previously > established a precedent, which accepts a license with the same confusing > requirement, and so it should be acceptable I don't know what this license says, but this "precedent" argument is not the right way to think about these issues. If a decision is clearly right, we don't need to cite a precedent for it, If we see a need to reconsider a decision, we should reconsider thoughtfully based on what we know and understand. Let's hope our old decisions were mostly wise and that few need reconsideration. -- Dr Richard Stallman (https://stallman.org) Chief GNUisance of the GNU Project (https://gnu.org) Founder, Free Software Foundation (https://fsf.org) Internet Hall-of-Famer (https://internethalloffame.org)
