Bruce Lewis wrote: [...] > Now you are citing someone who says "Such innovations rarely will > constitute infringing derivative works under the Copyright Act."
Someone == United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. > > "Rarely" implies it is possible. That mild and polite wording doesn't subvert the clear message. (Hint: "See generally Nadan, supra, at 1667-72.") regards, alexander. _______________________________________________ Gnu-misc-discuss mailing list Gnu-misc-discuss@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
