CHAPTER III: CONFRONTATION WITH THEORY OF RELATIVITY THE FOUR FUNDAMENTAL FORCES: The four fundamental forces (as every thing else) are the result of the effervescence phenomenon, its the same phenomenon with three variations according to ethon density variation in an area and to the variation of the way particles loose their ethons. GRAVITY: Usually Gravity is defined as the force of attraction. But well see that its not an attraction like we imagine it. So what is gravity: Gravity occurs between tow and more bodies. We said that effervescence of tow particles in an area creates a third field of ethon which looks like a field created by one particle. However each particle preserve its own ethon field in this system (a system includes many particles or bodies). (See picture n°) And we also said that direction of ethon current of a body is from the highest to the lowest density. Attraction occurs when the SUM of the ethons flow (of the third field) that is running out of the system PLUS the ethon flow created by each particle out of the system is BIGGER THAN ethon flow created inside the system. A+B+C >A1+B1 A: ethons loosed by A in opposite direction to B (out of system). B: ethons loosed by B in opposite direction to A (out of system). C: ethons of the united field that are always running out of the syste A1: ethons loosed by A towards B (inside system). B1: ethons loosed by B towards A (inside system). In other words gravity occurs when the physical space (or space-time) created out of the system is bigger than inside the system. When A+B+C =A1+B1 That means the smallest body is a satellite of the biggest. Rotation occurs because the third field of ethons is in rotation. And we said that motion is a creation and redistribution of ethons. So its the rotation of space time that make one body rotating around the other. The explanation of why gravity is so weak is that ethon density between bodies is very low while the density of ethons inside the atom is extremely high. When A+B+C <A1+B1 That means there is a third body, which changes the effervescence direction of the tow bodies and the system. Electro-weak force: The elector-weak force is the result of the way that particles loose their ethons. So, what happens exactly: We said that bodies (or particles) loose pre-ethons before these pre-ethons annihilate into ethons. In this case the particle (or body) loose pre-ethons in a certain shape: pre-ethons are loosed in a way that a given amount of pre-ethons draw a circle. The result of the annihilation of these pre-ethons with circle shape creates whirlwinds (of ethons) exactly as the explosion of hollow explosive charge (of dynamite). There are tow directions of whirlwinds of ethons, lets say clockwise and anti clockwise. These directions of rotation define the charge of a particle. So why tow particles with the same charge are attracted to each other while tow particles with opposite charge are repulsed from each other. To answer this question we must return to our example of tow particles in effervescence in the same area. Remember: The effervescence of tow particles in an area creates a third field of ethon which looks like a field created by one particle. However each particle preserve its own ethon field in this system (a system includes many particles or bodies). The attraction or repulsion of the tow bodies depends on the evolution of the amount of physical space between them. They are attracted if physical space created (and redistributed) inside the system is less than physical space created (and redistributed by ethon current) out of the system. When tow whirlwinds (of ethons) with the same direction of rotation are put together they annihilate creating a big amount of ethons between the tow particles. Thats why tow particles with the same charge are repulsed from each other. When tow whirlwinds (of ethons) with opposite directions of rotation are put together, their strength is boosted and by the way the ethon current that is running out of the system is boosted making the amount of ethons inside the system less important than the amount of ethons (produced and redistributed) out of the system. Thats why tow particles with opposite charge are attracted to each other. Strong nuclear force: Tow protons put together must create repulsion. Why its not the case in the nucleus: Protons loose pre-ethons in circle shape, the annihilation of the pre-ethons circles create whirlwinds (of ethons). These whirlwinds are supposed to make a repulsion but when we add tow neutrons, these neutrons also loose pre-ethons making circles loosed by protons disappear (circle shape is disturbed by pre-ethons loosed by neutrons) and by the way whirlwinds disappear too. These whirlwinds disappear inside the nucleus not out of it. Why there is attraction and not repulsion? Repulsion; attraction; or rotation depends on the effervescence rhythm of a system. This rhythm is related to distances; masses; charges etc. This relation is not linear . I cant say more. Observation: All photons are whirlwinds, but not all whirlwinds are photons. SPACE-TIME CURVATURE: Space-time curvature is the contrast of ethons density. Gravity to an area occurs when the ethon density there is higher than it is in the surrounding. For example: Gravity of an object to earth is due to high density of ethons that surround earth (ethon density decreases when we go forwards an object) And we said that ethon current direction is from the highest density to the lowest density so this direction is deviated when the object comes near earth. Earth and object are a system where the direction of ethons (of both earth and object) is out of the system. That means space is increasing out of the system. In addition to that, the flow of the third ethon field (the common field of earth and object) is going out of the system. That means space between the tow objects is decreasing. The combination of the tow effects creates the apparent attraction. Non-locality: We said that ethon density decrease when we go forward the nucleus. The contrast will be very high between an atom and its surrounding and even inside the atom itself. That means space time isnt the same and thats the origin of some quantum strangeness. And among them the uncertainty principle. So what are origins of non-locality: Trajectory of a particle inside an atom (in high ethon density) is a continuous succession of ethons. But when we transpose this trajectory out of the atom (in lower ethon density) it will give us a discontinuous succession of ethon. The high contrast inside the atom means space-time curvature. That means we can see one object in tow positions at the same time. Its similar to the effect of the sun gravity, which make us see one star in different positions at the same time. The high contrast (of ethon density) makes informations dont arrive to us in the right chronological order, because its deviated by (micro) space-time curvatures. - A particle loose pre-ethons in a position A and move to position B.pre-ethons are annihilating in position A and particle is annihilating in position B. and we said that all properties of matter are result of its effervescence. so we have an illusion to see the particle in tow position at the same time. May be thats why an electron is seen as a cloud around the nucleus. LIGHT SPEED: Well try here to explain how light speed is constant. Well also explain the physical time contraction. Relations are not linear, but to make the explanation easy will suppose them linear. Lets start: Light speed is constant in physical space according to the absolute time. That means light cross the same amount of ethons during an absolute second. Light speed isnt constant according to absolute space. This constancy is due to: - Absence of mass, this makes photons insensitive to background waves. And may be light is the only thing that exist continuously. (See quantum entanglement) Constancy of light speed: When people or objects are traveling at a substantial fraction of the speed of light; the density of ethons out of the system changes making the density of ethons inside the system (inside rocket) changing too. If rocket speed is 50% of LS; the amount of ethons inside a ruler becomes twice it is on earth. If a ruler length on earth was X ethons, it will be 2X in the rocket. However number of atoms that make the ruler remain the same. So what changed? Its the ethon density inside the atom and in space between atoms that changed. Their changing isnt proportional. But the combination of the tow (atom and space between atoms) makes the length of the ruler (by ethons) twice its length on earth. And we said that light speed cross ethons is constant, so light will take twice absolute time to cross the ruler. But what happens to atomic time? (See definition of atomic time) In the other hand we said that ethon density inside atoms changed, so speed inside atoms also changed (see definition of motion). Oscillations (are motion) inside atoms are twice slower. Thats why light speed according to atomic time remains the same. Observation: This model can explain other physical phenomenon like: light refraction diffraction and absorption, dark energy and many others but I think its useless. All I want is to introduce you to this view. ACCELERATORS: According to our hypothesis when traveling at a substantial fraction of the speed of light: life of a single particle (not system) must decrease, while atomic time contracts. But experimentation shows that particle life is longer in an accelerator. This can be explained by the fact that this particle (in very high speed) absorbs energy of whirlwinds that it cross inside the accelerator. (See whirlwinds in explanation of elector-weak and strong forces). These whirlwinds crossed (and absorbed) in the accelerator, change the inertia -resistance- of the particle to effervescence (mass is inertia resistance- to effervescence). This increasing of life particle inside an accelerator is a kind of matter creation. (See matter creation). Observation: all photons are whirlwinds but not all whirlwinds are photons. CHAPTER IV: CONFRONTATION WITH QUANTUM MECHANICS QUANTUM ENTANGLEMENT There is tow ways to explain quantum entanglement: The first is short and too easy, but it doesnt allow a perfect Simultaneity. The second is a little bit complicated but it allows (in given conditions) a perfect Simultaneity. First explanation: The space-time waves are crossed by waves like sound waves in sea waves. When we prepare two particles in a single quantum state they are in the same diapason, that means one particle vibrates according to the vibration of the other particle. This explanation presuppose sound-like waves inside space-time waves spreading faster than the speed of light, and the Simultaneity will not be perfect. The second explanation is more interesting Second explanation: We said that all properties of a particle are a result of its effervescence, a particle without effervescence doesnt exist physically. The effervescence process isnt continuos, its discontinuous, the effervescence is a succession of short effervescence sequences. We suppose that effervescence process is generated by background waves coming from the origin of the universe from the big bang explosion. When a background wave hits a particle it releases one effervescence sequence of this particle and creates an echo of the background wave. The background wave spreads in one way only, while its echo spreads in all directions forwards the particle. Our world doesnt exist continuously (because the background waves and their echo are not everywhere every time). When we prepare two particles in a single quantum state they are in the same diapason, that means one particle vibrates according to the vibration of the other particle. The Simultaneity will be perfect from A to B if this background wave direction is from A to B. It will be imperfect if the background wave is from B to A, in this case its the echo of the background wave coming from A that brings the vibration to B, time of correlation will be an entire number of one effervescence sequence. If we suppose that a single sequence of effervescence duration is a chronon, then time of correlation between A and B will be x choronon with x entire number. THE DUALITY WAVE-PARTICLE: We said that matter is annihilating into pre-ethons before these pre-ethons disintegrate into ethons. The amount of ethons produced by the pre-ethons annihilation is not linear its wavy. That means the space-time is wavy. In young experimentation interference fringes are made by space-time waves and because particles are moving in space-time their impact correspond to space-time waves impact. The particle exhibits a wave-like behavior when space-time waves have some properties and it exhibits a particle-like behavior when space-time waves have other properties. These properties can be: Space-time waves: length, height, frequency and direction. The particle exhibits a particle-like behavior when: The sum of space-time waves in physical vacuum and space-time waves produced by the particle effervescence is null. The sum is space-time waves with very long wavelength. The sum is space-time waves with very short height. The measurement problem: Measurement means information, and information means a motion of something (matter or photons) from the measured area to the measurement instrument. In other words measurement is a deviation at least of ethons. This deviation perturbs space-time waves and by the way perturbs the sum of space-time waves of the particle and vacuum. This measurement can also change the effervescence rhythm of the particle. Young experiment: In young experiment the measurement disturbs synchronization between space-time waves coming through the tow pinholes, The interference fringes disappear and the interference fringes of the particle disappear also. The disturbance occurs only at the measurement, because it occurs only when real deviation (of ethons) occurs. The synchronization between the tow pinholes disappear instantly, but it takes a while to appear again. We can say the same thing about the synchronization between space-time waves produced by a particle and space-time waves in vacuum it disappear instantly but it take a while to appear again. (a particle have an inertia -resistance- to change its effervescence rhythm) MATTER CREATION (AND MANY WORLDS): MATTER CREATION : We said that all properties of a particle are a result of its effervescence. Particle without effervescence doesnt exist physically. Our world is filled with particles without effervescence, without mass (mass is inertia resistance-of a body to effervescence) this lack of effervescence is due may be to: -The matter structure. -Or to its absolute speed (in absolute space). -Or to its insensitiveness to the background waves we mention in quantum entanglement. Whatever, when a photon cross (to avoid saying hits) this particle in given conditions, the photon energy changes the structure of this particle making it in effervescence state. The relation between energy and mass is in fact a relation between energy and the particle inertia-resistance- to effervescence. MANY WORLDS: This parallel world (or worlds) isnt well structured as ours, its rather a pollution of our world than a parallel world. Real parallel worlds (structured like ours) can exist but not in the same absolute location we have. However this pollution particles have memory, and interference with our world thats may be the explanation of some paranormal phenomenon. CONCLUSION I titled this paper a sketch. because its an outline. I hope you have understood this amateur view. My goal is to share this idea (may be its helpful in someway), Youll agree that Ive a monstrous lack of knowledge in physics and mathematics, but my reasoning is logical, naïve but logical. Ive been told that to be taken seriously a hypothesis must be crazy .I tried to make it as crazy as possible, unfortunately I couldnt leave my common sense, sorry I need it Certainly this paper is worthless but no one can say its wrong. If we really reached the common sense limits neither wrong nor right remains. The only hope this paper has comes from the fact that mathematicians at a macroscopic and microscopic scale with existing technology can simulate this hypothesis. A further understanding will lead us to make predictions that can be verified by experimentation. I hope this idea is enough explained and expound to pass judgement on. (As an amateur of course). This paper doesnt need comments I am not able to understand them. But you can help me by giving address of physics amateur web site. And if you have some advises about studies in Europe send them to: BELGUERNINE AHMED: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] phone: + 21363585822 _______________________________________________ Gnu-misc-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
