Do you mean this? "If distribution of executable or object code is made by offering access to copy from a designated place, then offering equivalent access to copy the source code from the same place counts as distribution of the source code, even though third parties are not compelled to copy the source along with the object code."
This seems to mean that it would NOT be OK to keep the code proprietary, counter to what I've seen on this forum before. But maybe it's this: the person accessing my website would not have access to the software itself; they would only be able to use it in narrow ways the webmaster has defined. In other words, it wouldn't be OK to modify Emacs and allow people full remote use of it on my server without giving out the source, but it would be OK to modify MySQL so people can do simple searchbox queries through HTTP that query my customized database. Does that sound right? _______________________________________________ Gnu-misc-discuss mailing list Gnu-misc-discuss@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
